Our World in Context

world politics for beginners

Archive for June, 2008

Pork-barreling

In politics, the term pork-barrel refers to government spending that is intended to benefit constituents of a politician in return for their political support, either in the form of campaign contributions or votes. This is done typically by diverting government funding for projects to a certain locale – through taxpayers’ money – even though it is likely to benefit only particular constituents or campaign contributors.

There’s a good example from The Australian in The PM rolls out his own pork barrel (3 June, 2008),  which claims 90 per cent of almost $150 million in regional grants announced by Labor during last year’s election campaign went to Labor-held or Labor-targeted marginal electorates. 

World Mapper

Since we’re on the topic of nation-states, this website, I reckon, deserves a mention. Worldmapper is a collection of world maps, where territories are re-sized on each map according to the subject of interest – such as movement, food, resources, income, poverty, education, health, disaster, disease, pollution and religion.

Maps like these no doubt challenges us to think about our world differently, beyond the conventional geopolitical boundaries and the high-powered ideas of nation-states, to other ways in which we organise human affairs.

Nation-states

I’ve just embarked on Keith Suter’s 50 Things You Wanted to Know About World Issues (but were too afraid to ask). It’s a highly recommended text for those who wish to ease their way into world politics minus the jargon and technical gobbledygook.

His list of “50 things” start from the simple but important question, ‘How many countries are there in the world and how are they created?’ to bigger topics, such as ‘Is China the next super power? Can the West win the war on terrorism? Is the world running out of oil? Is Microsoft more powerful than a nation like Australia? Why did the United States invade Iraq? Will there ever be peace in Israel and Palestine?’

I ruminate on the first chapter this week.

On the top of Keith Suter’s list is the question ‘How many countries are there in the world and how are they created?’ It was a question I have never thought to ask, as you would when my first brush with geography saw me learning to place the names of countries and their capitals on the world map.

There are currently around 200 countries in the world, 191 of which belong to the United Nations and are known as nation-states.

As Suter would remind us, the creation of nation-states was a deliberate process that began some centuries ago in Europe as rulers sought to consolidate their power against domestic and foreign forces, creating what we now know as the early monarchies.

Europe began colonising parts of the world as early as AD1500, as traders set forth in search of gold, silver, spices and other commodities.

These included

  • Africa – colonisers set up a triangle of trade where European-manufactured goods were used to buy African slaves from Arab slave traders. The slaves, numbering more than 11 million, were shipped across the Atlantic to the Americas where they worked on sugar, cotton and tobacco plantations. The produce was then shipped back to Europe.
  • the Americas – people wishing to escape persecution in Europe fled to Americas where they took over parts of the land.
  • and Australia – which became a dumping ground for British convicts.

The overall effect, Suter explains, was that thriving indigenous civilisations were destroyed and European citizens and values were imposed on the land. The victims of colonialism were also drawn into struggles they knew nothing about, such as Indian forces fighting for the UK in WWI and WWII.

The critical voices against colonialism asserted that it was wrong for one country to dominate another. Competing colonial ambitions between Germany and other dominant powers, they argued, had been a catalyst for the First World War. Allied countries agreed after the war that countries who were defeated in the war would be held in a mandate and put on the road to independence, overseen by the League of Nations.

The same agreement was reached after the Second World War, under the protection of the United Nations, which had by that point replaced the League of Nations. The Allied countries were also to grant independence to their extensive colonies.

It is my guess that us folk who belong to gen-y and beyond would hardly be conscious of the impact that colonialisation has had on the world as we know it. As Suter puts it, the world has been permanently transformed by 500 years of Europeanisation. European cultures now dominate the world. That the English language is the “universal” tool for communication – in areas such as commerce, trade and politics – is proof. The colonialists have left their mark on our ideologies, paradigms and culture in this post-colonial era.  

Interestingly, Suter also mentions the role of Japan in putting an end to the European imperialism in the Second World War. The Japanese occupation may have been brutish and the atrocities of war repugnant, but the capture of Singapore in 1942 sent a powerful message to the west, that Europeans were not invincible.

Hegemony

Definition: He·gem·o·ny [noun] refers to leadership or dominance, especially by one country or social group over others.

In world politics, hegemony usually refers to power and control exercised by a leading state over other states.

Peak Oil

Definition: Peak oil is the point in time when the maximum rate of global petroleum production is reached, after which the rate of production enters its terminal decline.

The topic of peak oil has received quite a lot of attention in the media of late as oil prices soar to $135 a barrel. If it’s the first time you’ve ever heard of the term, Wikipedia gives a simple but detailed backgrounder on peak oil. 

Asymmetrical globalisation

FLIGHTS from across Asia Pacific take less than ten hours, and much less if you are hurtling down the information highway and the various channels of communication. We can get things going much faster. But it is easy to forget that this is only happening in some parts of the world. Globalisation as such, can be described as asymmetrical. The world has shrunk in some parts, but not others.

Figures by the World Bank show that in 2006, people in high-income economies held an average income of $36,608 while those in developing economies earned an average of $1,997, with some earning as little as $649 a person per year.

Enormous inequalities of power exists between states, global governance tends to privilege the interests and agenda of global capitalism, and the technocratic nature of much global decision-making, from health to security, can exclude many with a legitimate stake in the outcomes. 

Inevitably, we end up with distorted global politics – i.e. those states and groups with greater power resources and access to key sites of global decision-making will most likely have the greatest control or influence over the agenda and outcomes of global politics.

A shrinking world

PRESSURE is growing for Prime Minister Kevin Rudd to take up the issue of whaling with Japan and to use the same diplomatic vigour that he employed to raise Tibetan human rights with China, The Age reported early last month.

Worried that the Government may be softening its anti-whaling stance against Australia’s best trade customer, opposition parties and environment groups said they wanted Mr Rudd instead to push the issue when he visits Tokyo next month, it was reported.

The issue of whaling, as Anne Cullen points out, is one of the prime examples of globalisation, which has seen governments and non-state actors coming together to address the rapidly declining stocks of whales in the worlds’ oceans. 

Globalisation is about the increasing interconnectedness we see in every sphere of social, political and economic life and across political and national frontiers. With globalisation, we see a blurring of the territorial boundaries between nations and states, of national economic and political spaces.

As organisations and lobby groups such as the International Whaling Commission, Greenpeace and the Japan Whaling Association show, social, economic and political activities can be organised not just on a local or national scale, but increasingly on a global scale.

The first post

The idea for this site was birthed when a friend of mine asked me to send her my study notes from the world politics short course I was about to embark on. Like me, she was interested in understanding our world in context. September 11, the attack on America’s world trade centre, was no doubt a wake up call for the spoilt lot of us Gen Y folk – as we sat up and took notice, many of us for the first time, of the world around us.

This site will be a work-in-progress, which I hope, will evolve into a useful resource for students of world politics, and more importantly, it will serve as a starting point for those who just want to know a little bit more about what’s going on around the world.

Many friends have asked me where to go to keep abreast with the news and current affairs, and I have sought to provide links across a wide range of media, from the New York Times to the arabic Al Jazeera and the China Daily.

So, to Wenx, thanks for sparking this idea, and I hope it will be useful to you, as well as all and sundry.